Witches…

…or what I might have been in bygone eras or a different postcode

Halloween was always a big deal for my kids. The thrill of fancy dress was cool enough, but the promise of unlimited confectionery from a whole bunch of strangers made it, in Middle Child’s words, better than Christmas. He and Firstborn Son have outgrown it, but it’s still a thing for Only Daughter. She’s looking forward to trick or treating as a witch this year. While I’m not thrilled about the crazy commercialisation of this traditional fiesta, I kinda like the fact that she can be a witch and no-one will bat an eyelid. She could claim to be a sorceress, for that matter, make a living from potions, charms and amulets and I still wouldn’t have to fear for her safety. Huh? I hear you ask, why would I fear for her safety? Well, being a witch (or merely being perceived as one) wasn’t always compatible with life!

Not so long ago, any woman who was a bit too independent, resolutely single, a little too smart, and shamefully unrepentant about her ability to get by without the “Til death do us part”,  could be accused of witchcraft. Let’s face it, in a system designed to keep her dependent and subjugated, only an alliance with the devil could explain her ability to thrive without an actual husband.

If I’d lived in those times, I’d have have met too many of these criteria for comfort. Midwifery was uncomfortably associated with witchcraft; holy matrimony didn’t agree with me; I was not practicing celibacy (ideally by being cloistered in a nunnery); the unholy fornication resulted in non-immaculate conception! Oh, and I  live with a black cat because she chose us, which is an honour because cats are picky.

Not gonna lie, had I lived in those times I probably wouldn’t have been quite such a brazen upstart. The consequences would have been too scary, I think. Dishonour, the proverbial shelf, old maidhood, the nunnery, the ducking stool… I’d have been grateful for my basic home-ec education, would have settled for an advantageous alliance with a suitable boy, and had a brace of kids, my last pregnancy probably coinciding with the birth of my first grandchild. I’d probably have done a good job breeding. I could have been quite the matriarch. Then again that’s the life that 12 year old me thought she would have (albeit with more education, fewer kids, a suitable boy of her choice). That 12 year old also knew she’d be a midwife. She’d would have been incredulous if you’d told her how life would work out!

Midwifery back in the days would have required the kind of strong stomach and a familiarity with death which today’s me isn’t sure she could handle. I don’t think I’d have lasted even if I’d had the vocation. Today’s me did discover that she had a stronger stomach than she suspected though. Perhaps yesteryear me would have too. If so, I’d have been existing on the fringes of acceptability and my survival would have depended on my ability to subsist on gratitude. My services would be undervalued because it’s not a job, it’s a vocation. My skills would depend entirely on who had trained me because a midwife didn’t have a textbook or randomised controlled trials to guide her practice. If I’d shown too much aptitude for studying what limited resources were available I might have been tempted to call myself a professional and that (in a woman) is just pride. We know what comes after that. Prejudice, obviously. And then a trial by water. The judgy waters would either welcome me and I’d be vindicated but dead. Or not. Me? I kinda float, as the 10 year old me discovered when she had no difficulty treading water for five minutes despite being the not particularly fit child that got picked second last for sports teams. While this random attribute makes me a decent swimmer, it would have sealed my witchy fate. Rejected by the water, I’d have been toast. The thought of that would probably have made me less likely to resist  my feminine destiny. 

Even as recently as the 1950s, midwives, nurses and nuns were pretty interchangeable. They all had celibacy in common though. They knew what happened to fallen women. Those women also ended up in (different) nunneries doing serious penance for being the female half of a fertile couple. To think I might have been both midwife and inmate!

I hark back at the horrors of bygone eras, but the truth is that for plenty of women today, failure to live “honourably” as a woman has drastic and unpleasant consequences. Charges of witchcraft may no longer apply but the punishment for perceived transgressions are still brutal and often incompatible with life. But the sanctions don’t have to be physically violent to be effective: just the threat of spinsterhood through reputation damage is enough to keep vast numbers of women around the world toeing a very Conservative line. I’m not sure I would have fared too well.

The recurring theme does seem to focus on a woman’s chastity. Bad enough if it were that simple. Sadly, even today, a woman’s purity can only be guaranteed if she protects herself from the male gaze. Attracting a lustful stare due to an ill concealed tendril of hair or a naked ankle can seal her fate as impure temptress, and what man could possibly trust such a woman to be the mother of his, and only his kids. Ugh! How  convenient for a man (who caused conception) to abandon his baby human because its mother was looked at wrong by another bloke.

So yeah, Halloween may be a wee bit excessive, a bit pagan, overly commercial, a touch ghoulish, frankly ungodly. But if you are a girl who lives in a post code where (for one night a year) you can safely roam the streets begging for sweets while dressed as a witch, you are likely to grow up enjoying a half decent level of equality with your brothers. May the treats be with you, sweet child of mine. May the candy be abundant!

One response to “Witches…”

  1. I feel compelled, as both Clinical Lead and a senior member of the Medical Staff Committee, to offer a spot of collegial balance to this colourful post from our labour ward corridor. While I always support healthy staff morale, Claire, we must be terribly careful about conflating ancient superstition with what was, in retrospect, simply the early implementation of clinical governance.

    Let’s address the Halloween business first. At our home in Dulwich, we don’t permit trick or treating. It strikes me as nothing more than an unregulated distribution of refined glucose, completely undermining the paediatric dental targets we set at Trust board level. My boys, Peregrine and Barnaby, spent their evening cataloguing pressed oak leaves before an early lights-out. Eleanor, my wife, whom I wed with full church credentials at St Barnabas in 2004, did suggest Peregrine might wear a pirate patch, but I firmly reminded her that glorifying maritime lawlessness does little to foster civic duty.

    Your assertion that historical witch trials were a simple patriarchal conspiracy is rather uncharitable to the administrative classes of the period. One must inspect the audit trail. If you study seventeenth-century parish records, those magistrates weren’t persecuting women out of malice. They were dealing with unregistered practitioners peddling herbal remedies without a basic risk assessment or an official licence. The ducking stool, while unquestionably robust and entirely absent from modern NICE guidelines, was merely an early diagnostic test. It was an empirical attempt to establish whether an individual was subject to supernatural contamination or standard physical laws. A person with low specific gravity who floats can’t blame the pond for noting the anomaly. That is a straightforward question of density and measurable displacement.

    As for your breezy comments regarding holy matrimony, I find them professionally baffling. The traditional family unit remains the gold standard of domestic resource allocation. It provides a clearly audited line of paternity, which avoids protracted inheritance disputes. To suggest that choosing an advantageous match with a suitable boy is a historical tragedy completely ignores the efficiency of a well-negotiated marriage settlement. Eleanor and I run our household with clear protocols and strict budgetary caps. There’s simply no room for chaotic improvisation.

    Regarding your black cat, I couldn’t help but sigh. Domestic animals ought to possess verifiable lineage rather than random urban origins. Our Golden Retriever, Chancellor, has five generations of Kennel Club documentation and walks precisely to heel. A stray feline that chooses you sounds suspiciously like an unsanctioned squatter exploiting lax perimeter security.

    Now to the matter of midwifery. You suggest you’d have been burned for calling yourself a professional. Well, Claire, with the greatest of respect, genuine professionalism requires formal medical accreditation from a royal college, backed by rigorous knowledge of clinical intervention. When a difficult transverse lie presented itself in 1680, a dried toadstool didn’t resolve the obstructed pelvis. A gentleman with a pair of Chamberlen instruments did. The historical emergence of the male accoucheur wasn’t prejudice; it was the sensible dawn of surgical intervention and hygiene protocols.

    Your complaints about modesty and the male gaze also miss the practicalities of visual decorum. As I constantly remind our junior doctors during morning ward rounds, presentation matters. If an untidy curl causes disruption, the remedy is sensible compliance with uniform policy, exactly like our bare-below-the-elbows directive. Compliance isn’t oppression; it’s infection control and professional dignity. Modesty provides a tidy boundary that prevents misunderstandings before they start. Blaming men for looking seems rather unscientific when biological optics demonstrate that visual stimuli dictate neurological response.

    I do hope your daughter enjoys her sweets, though I’d strongly suggest a post-prandial brush with high-fluoride paste. However, wandering the pavement as a broom-riding malefactor sends quite the wrong message to the youth of Camberwell. If a young lady wants to celebrate female advancement, she’d be far better off dressing as Florence Nightingale or Queen Victoria. They understood duty and public service.

    Mr Julian H. V. Montgomery-Finch, MBBS, FRCOG
    Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecological Surgeon, Clinical Lead for Labour Ward Governance, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply